This domain serves as a reference point for examining how the effective reach of law and jurisdiction can shift over time without formal declaration.
In such conditions, boundaries are no longer defined only by territory, citizenship, or explicit sovereignty claims. Jurisdictional effect may extend through financial systems, technical standards, platform rules, criminal procedure, administrative measures, or cross-border coordination mechanisms.
Jurisdictional Drift does not presume any specific country, regime, or value position. It is not equivalent to territorial expansion, and it does not necessarily involve war or occupation.
Its purpose is to name a process: under global interconnection and high technical density, legal effect and the radius of power may undergo continuous displacement rather than one-time declaration.
This may appear as extraterritorial regulation, normalization of transnational enforcement, or long-term boundary adjustment within grey zones.
This page is intentionally minimal.
It exists to ensure the term Jurisdictional Drift has a stable place to stand.
本網域作為一個參考標記，用於檢視：當法律與管轄權的實際適用範圍， 在未經正式宣告或明確修訂的情況下，隨時間逐步改變時，權力邊界將如何被重新理解。
在此狀態中，邊界不再僅由領土、國籍或明確主權宣示所界定。 管轄效力可能透過金融系統、技術標準、平台規則、刑事程序、行政措施或跨境協作機制， 逐步延伸至原本不屬於其直接控制的空間。
「管轄漂移」不預設特定國家、制度或價值立場。 它既不等同於領土擴張，也不必然涉及戰爭或佔領。
其目的是標示一種過程：在全球互聯與高度技術化的條件下， 法律效力與權力半徑可能呈現連續性的位移，而非一次性的宣告。
此概念可能體現為域外適用的法規、跨境執行機制的常態化， 或制度邊界在灰色地帶中的長期調整。
本頁刻意維持極簡。
它存在，是為了確保 管轄漂移（Jurisdictional Drift） 這個概念能有一個穩定的立足點。